New Westminster MP Fin Donnelly is raising questions in Ottawa about leaked information that alleges the Conservatives are proposing to remove habitat protection measures from the Fisheries Act.
"I plan on asking the (Fisheries Minister Keith Ashfield) about this. They are obviously keeping this secret, and we want to find out if this is happening, if this is the case," Donnelly said Tuesday morning. "This is huge. This is one of the biggest things that I've seen. ... Now they are removing a key element of the Fisheries Act that protects the fishery and the marine ecosystem. They are doing it without consultation and without consulting their own departments involved. As far as I know, many of the departmental scientists and bureaucrats are unaware of this."
Donnelly, the NDP fisheries critic, was acting on information from Otto Langer, a retired biologist who used to work for Fisheries and Oceans Canada. Langer said he received leaked information that the Conservatives are proposing to remove the term "habitat" from the Fisheries Act.
The act currently states that no one can carry on work or undertaking that "results in the harmful alteration, disruption or destruction of fish habitat." According to Langer, the change would read: "no person shall carry on any work, undertaking or activity other than fishing, that results in an adverse effect on a fish of economic, cultural or ecological value."
"The government is totally re-writing the habitat protection provisions of Section 35(1) so as to remove habitat protection out of the Fisheries Act," Langer said in a media statement. "This is a serious situation and will put Canada back to where we were in the pre-1976 period, where Canada had no laws to protect fish habitat and no way to monitor the great industrial expansion that occurred in Canada with the consequential loss of major fish habitat all across Canada."
Fish habitat includes lakes, rivers, oceans and their water flows. According to Langer, it will be difficult to protect habitat if the term is removed from the act.
"What is a fish of economic, cultural and ecological value?" he asked. "If it has no economic value, can it be needlessly destroyed?"
Langer worked for the federal fisheries department and Environment Canada for 32 years in habitat and water quality protection. He has also qualified as an expert witness in more than 100 pollution and habitat destruction cases in Canada.
Langer is alleging that the Tories will try to include these Fisheries Act changes in the omnibus budget bill. To read Langer's full, three-page letter, go to Jennifer Moreau's blog at www.burnabynow.com and click on the Opinion tab.