Dear Editor:
Re: Ask about candidates' health, Letters to the editor, The Record, Sept. 19.
I am amazed! This letter has so many flaws it is nearly unbelievable. It is such a thinly veiled attempt to discredit certain members of our current council and possible contenders that it borders on laughable.
First of all, by law it is generally speaking unacceptable for even employers to ask a person's age or health status when interviewing in the hiring process. It is considered discriminatory.
A person's age and health are private issues and should be left that way.
According to Mr. Palmer, all voters should ask each candidate these two questions before deciding whether they think a candidate will be able to last for a four- year term on council. What does he think should be done with the usual 15 to 20 candidates? Line them up in Anvil Centre so the masses can come and check each and every one to make a determination if they are suitable to stand for election. Or perhaps waste the time during all-candidates meetings.
Given his logic (or lack of), we should also check and see if they drive too fast, cross streets, take flights, eat fatty foods or any number of activities that could possibly affect their ability to complete their terms.
I certainly hope Mr. Palmer does not seek a seat on council again this year as I will be the first to ask about his health, especially his mental health,which according to his letter would be fair game.
So sad!
Vance McFadyen, New Westminster
