Dear Editor:
Re: Unfair shot at NDP candidate, Letters, The Record, Feb. 13.
I was quite surprised that Graeme Bowbrick, a former high-ranking NDP member (auditor general and minister of advanced education under the Glen Clark regime) would enter into the independent debate so early.
I think his analysis of James Crosty's letter, Crosty ponders run, from the Feb. 6 edition of The Record, was more reflective of toeing party politics than of trying to accurately discuss Mr. Crosty's statements.
Bowbrick's letter confirms Crosty's testament that a faction of disenfranchised NDP members exist in our city, and many have shared their concerns with him.
Mr. Bowbrick states that, " . he takes a shot at NDP candidate . as having been 'parachuted' into New West."
Bowbrick should reread the article before commenting on what he thought he read. Crosty clearly stated he was sharing conversations he has had with NDP supporters about the parachuting issue, not having ever said that himself.
Bowbrick points out that he also was parachuted into this area and was the subject of discourse and comment. What is "unbecoming" and "dumb" is not being truthful about parachuting and name-calling in what is perhaps an attempt to squelch the discussion.
Like Bowbrick, Crosty was not born here either, but he has called New West home for more than 20 years. While long-term residency is not a requirement to run, it is a distinct advantage when discussing and understanding issues applicable to our 150-year-old Royal City.
Bowbrick's writing of an ill-informed candidate endorsement; "I know her by reputation," speaks soundly to the reasoning behind considering an independent MLA such as Crosty to be our representative in Victoria.
While Crosty has his detractors, he also has his supporters. He proved his dedication to the city and its people in the 2011 municipal election and the 2012 $59-million petition, to name a few.
Crosty's supporters know him to be an independent thinker, a person of integrity and one whose convictions could merge many of the NDP, Liberal, Green and Conservative ideals.
While I have no doubt New West "would do well" with party politics, perhaps New West would do better with an independent one.
An independent candidate may increase voter turnout, heighten the campaign, the debate, the public interest and discussion. After reading Mr. Bowbrick's letter, I think it already has.
Calling someone dumb because they have become aware of an issue is not the way to engage in a meaningful discussion. So much for the NDP not running a negative campaign! Perhaps such negativity is the reason for public apathy toward politics.
Ann Mayo, by email
